Monday, October 4, 2010

Moyers: Obamas Bad Gamble on Afghanistan -- 100000 Soldiers Used as Chips for a Bet the US Cant Win World

Apr 12, 2010 & US President Barack Obama disembarks the Marine One helicopter as he arrives at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. Obama was urged by his alloy Sunday to give up smoking for great after his initial health check-up as US boss found him differently in "excellent health" and "fit for duty." Photo Credit: AFP - Jewel Samad & & World headlines around email. & & Start a Petition » change_setup("300", "Featured", "all", "#DCB000", 6); BILL MOYERS: Welcome to the Journal. The fight in Afghanistan has claimed some-more than one thousand American lives and in the last dual years alone the lives of some-more than 4 thousand Afghan civilians. Its costing American taxpayers over three-and-a-half billion dollars each montha sum of a little $264 billion so far. But for all that, in the difference of one process researcher quoted by the New York Times this week, there are no improved angels about to deplane on Afghanistan.The headlines from that torturous bridgehead continues to dismay, daunt and enrage. Americas directed towards motorist there, Hamid Karzai, is proof increasingly inconstant at the behind of the wheel. The United States put Karzai in energy and the soldiers have been fighting and failing on his interest ever since. Despite drawn out corrupton in his government. Now hes creation threats opposite the horse opera bloc that is shedding red blood and value on his behalf.Even some-more disturbing,for the moment, are the municipal deaths from night raids andaerial bombings by American and alternative NATO troops. Just this week, we schooled of an strong cover following a Special Forces raid in Feb that killed five civilians, together with 3 women, dual of whom were pregnant. Its believed bullets were gouged from the womens bodies to disguise justification of American involvement.This massacre of innocents has led the pro-American Economist repository to subject either ourentire bid in Afghanistan has been zero but a incomprehensible practice of misled violence.With me is a man with first-hand experience of war. Andrew Bacevich served twenty-three years, a little of them in Vietnam, prior to timid from the Army. Hes right away highbrow of story and general family at Boston University. Just this week he was at a US Army War College conference on the rarely impending question, How do we know when a fight is over? His book, The Limits of Power, was a best-seller and his latest, Washington Rules: Americas Path to Permanent War, comes out this summer. Andrew Bacevich, acquire behind to the Journal.ANDREW BACEVICH: Thank you unequivocally much.BILL MOYERS: These municipal casualties that we"ve been conference about, they"re unavoidable in war, right?ANDREW BACEVICH: Sure they are. But I think that whats quite critical about the incidents that we"re celebration of the mass about is that they unequivocally call in to subject U.S. strategy. I mean, when General McChrystal recognised of this counterinsurgency proceed in Afghanistan, one of the, sort of the core beliefs is that we would action in ways that would denote the soft intentions. We"re ostensible to be safeguarding the population. And when it turns out that U.S. forces are murdering non-combatants, and there are steady incidents that have occurred, I think it calls in to subject the sincerity, the earnest of the strategy. Or it calls in to subject the border to that McChrystal is essentially in carry out of the forces that he commands.123456; &
that enables the make the most efficient use of their stored energy in the muscles • for acnebreaking dawntwilight sagamilkydry skinbridal gownshow to hairsuit imprimantefor acne milk

No comments:

Post a Comment